Goro můžeš mi tohle vysvětlit, pořád tohle nemůžu pochopit - že se věcí dějí a já je nevolím. Potřebuji nějaké vysvětlení. Stále mi to nedochází JAK JE TO MOŽNÉ a CO TO PRO MĚ ZNAMENÁ - CO SE ZMĚNÍ V MÉM VNÍMÁNÍ, JAKMILE PŘIJMU TENTO FAKT;
Direct Pointing E-book page 28 & 29:
Some people fight with moods and pride. To them, challenge
directly, and nicely, one of their core beliefs. Ask them what do they
believe, where are they on the spiritual path, what is their practice
and quickly some obvious belief that hasn’t been let go of will come
up. Like “I need to accept things”, or “I’m the creator of my life”, or
“I choose and decide because I have free will and I’m responsible”.
There can be more of course, but I’ve noticed that people can be very
intimately attached to these beliefs. When that comes up, be nice,
smiling.... lovingly inviting them to start checking the validity of
this. It’s never an attack on them, and it’s never to be right either. It’s
always to help them open their minds to 1. the possibility that they
might be wrong and 2. the actual verifying of it.
In these cases, something magical happens, and it becomes a
great opportunity for quick and earth-shattering changes. You actu-
ally push them with direct and simple questions and soon enough
they will be shocked at the obviousness that their beliefs are false.
Examples of reversing energy: On acceptance:—How do you
not accept what’s happening now (this noise, my hair, the weather)?
How would you do that, show me?
On creator :—How did you create this table? How do you cre-
ate a thought? How about this noise? On chooser:—Tell me what
are you sure you have chosen in your life? Then take him or her
to retrace the actual event and the remembrance of that moment
when they decided to marry the guy, to go on holidays, to start a ca-
reer, etc… And show them that they actually don’t choose anything,
it’s more of a huge ensemble of uncontrolled conditions and events,
mixed with a specific conditioning (genes, culture..) that is actually
deciding. Show them how even their preferences they don’t decide.
“Did you choose to like chocolate?” “Did you actually decide to love
men?” and also “Did you choose to be interested in dancing, or was
it something automatic?”
If a little resistance to truth comes up, ask why do they have this
taste and interest and not the neighbour? They will see that condi-
tioning is at play and many events also but not them. That has
the quick power to have the foundations crumble on the spot or in a
few minutes (wow... crying... laughing… and on)
Ty jsi sám myslím říkal něco ve smyslu "Neexistuje svobodné rozhodování, všechno je dáno, ?nebo se dějě?" Teď přesně nevím, jen cítím že tohle s tím nějak souvisí.
Ještě jednou upřením vydzvihnu otázku, pořád tohle nemůžu pochopit - že se věcí dějí a já je nevolím. Potřebuji nějaké vysvětlení. Stále mi to nedochází JAK JE TO MOŽNÉ a CO TO PRO MĚ ZNAMENÁ - CO SE ZMĚNÍ V MÉM VNÍMÁNÍ, JAKMILE PŘIJMU TENTO FAKT. ?
Edit: tohle k tomu také patří:
For some reason, I’ve used this since the beginning of the work-
shop: “Is it true?”. Before “Is there someone?” or “Do you have a
choice?”. It is the key point, just like “look” is the key approach in
lu. Look is the moment of truth. So everything is aimed at having
the attendant look for themselves. And I believe that what I write
here are ways among others to bring the moments of looking to a
definite kill, easy and quick. “Is it true?” forces the mind to stop
imagining. “Look” is the same command. It transpires truth. We
don’t know what truth is, but the question is the closest thing to it.